Side Effects of Long-Term Continuous Intra-arterial Nimodipine Infusion in Patients with Severe Refractory Cerebral Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Long-term continuous intra-arterial nimodipine infusion (CIAN) is a rescue therapy option in cases of severe refractory cerebral vasospasm (CV) following acute non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, CIAN therapy can be associated with relevant side effects. Available studies focus on intracerebral complications, whereas extracerebral side effects are rarely examined. Aim of the present study was to generate descriptive data on the clinical course during CIAN therapy and expectable extracerebral side effects. METHODS: All patients treated with CIAN therapy for at least 5 days between May 2011 and December 2015 were included. We retrospectively extracted data from the patient data management system regarding the period between 2 days before the beginning and 5 days after the termination of CIAN therapy to analyze the course of ventilation parameters and pulmonary gas exchange, hemodynamic support, renal and liver function, integrity of the gastrointestinal tract, and the occurrence of infectious complications. In addition, we recorded the mean daily values of intracranial pressure (ICP) and intracerebral problems associated with CIAN therapy. RESULTS: Data from 28 patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. The mean duration of long-term CIAN therapy was 10.5 ± 4.5 days. Seventeen patients (60.7%) reached a good outcome level (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] 4-5) 6 months after SAH. An impairment of the pulmonary gas exchange occurred only at the very beginning of CIAN therapy. The required vasopressor support with norepinephrine was significantly higher on all days during and the first day after CIAN therapy compared to the situation before starting CIAN therapy. Two patients required short-time resuscitation due to cardiac arrest during CIAN therapy. Acute kidney injury was observed in four patients, and one of them required renal replacement therapy with sustained low-efficiency daily dialysis. During CIAN therapy, 23 patients (82.1%) needed the escalation of a previous antiinfective therapy or the onset of antibiotics which was in line with a significant increase of C-reactive protein and white blood cell count. Obstipation was observed in 22 patients (78.6%). Ten patients (35.7%) even showed insufficient defecation on at least seven consecutive days. Compared to the situation before, ICP was significantly higher during the whole period of CIAN therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term CIAN therapy is associated with diverse side effects. The leading problems are an impairment of the hemodynamic situation and cardiac problems, an increase in infectious complications, a worsening of the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, and rising ICP values. Teams on neurointensive care units must be aware of these side effects to avoid that the beneficial effects of CIAN therapy on CV reported elsewhere are foiled by the problems this technique can be associated with.

[Cerebellar Infarction After Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy]. / Kleinhirninfarkt nach CO-Intoxikation und hyperbarer Sauerstofftherapie.

We report on a patient who developed a space-occupying cerebellar infarction with occlusive hydrocephalus after a poisoning with carbon monoxide with the intention to commit suicide. A neurosurgical and intensive care therapy were needed. The patient's survival without severe neurological deficits could be secured due to the early detection of the intracerebral lesions.

Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch Solution on Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Suffering from Cerebral Vasospasm Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The application of third-generation hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions in critically ill patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) was often part of the treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). However, there is increasing evidence showing a correlation between the application of HES and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis including 81 patients without a preexisting renal disorder suffering from aSAH who had received higher volumes of 6 % HES 130/0.4 due to standard treatment of DCI, the incidence of AKI during intensive care unit (ICU) stay was recorded using AKIN criteria. Furthermore, the course of serum creatinine after discharge from ICU was observed. RESULTS: 6 % HES 130/0.4 was given over a period of 12.9 ± 7.1 days resulting in a cumulative dose of 12543.2 ± 7743.6 mL. Four patients (4.9 %) fulfilled AKIN criteria stage 1 during ICU stay. In two of these patients, serum creatinine was within normal range again on day of discharge. Five patients showed elevated levels of serum creatinine within 1 to 22 months after hospitalization. A correlation between the amount of HES given and the incidence of AKI could not be found. CONCLUSION: The application of 6 % HES 130/0.4 did not lead to an elevated incidence of AKI in patients without an elevated baseline serum creatinine. However, there is still a lack of high-level evidence as prospective randomized trials are missing yet.

Continuous intra-arterial nimodipine infusion in patients with severe refractory cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a feasibility study and outcome results.

BACKGROUND: Severe cerebral vasospasm is a major cause of death and disability in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. No causative treatment is yet available and hypertensive hypervolemic therapy (HHT) is often insufficient to avoid delayed cerebral ischemia and neurological deficits. We compared patients receiving continuous intra-arterial infusion of the calcium-antagonist nimodipine with a historical group treated with HHT and oral nimodipine alone. METHODS: Between 0.5 and 1.2 mg/h of nimodipine were continuously administered by intra-arterial infusion via microcatheters either into the internal carotid or vertebral artery or both, depending on the areas of vasospasm. The effect was controlled via multimodal neuromonitoring and transcranial Doppler sonography. Outcome was determined by means of the Glasgow Outcome Scale at discharge and 6 months after the hemorrhage and compared to a historical control group. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received 28 intra-arterial nimodipine infusions. Six months after discharge, the occurrence of cerebral infarctions was significantly lower (42.6 %) in the nimodipine group than in the control group (75.0 %). This result was reflected by a significantly higher proportion (76.0 %) of patients with good outcome in the nimodipine-treated group, when compared to 10.0 % good outcome in the control group. Median GOS was 4 in the nimodipine group and 2 in the control group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intra-arterial nimodipine infusion is an effective treatment for patients with severe cerebral vasospasm who fail to respond to HHT and oral nimodipine alone. Key to the effective administration of continuous intra-arterial nimodipine is multimodal neuromonitoring and the individual adaptation of dosage and time of infusion for each patient.